|
-}PïP{-: Vry close and tense game, it went up with ties all the time, until 4-2 for them, then it got 4-4, 5-5 , we lost some maps cause some people were having some problems with connecting ( sky and bb had also some ping problems ) So subbase was practically 2v4 DEF aargh and at bridge 2nd time our new recruit (HonK pld m8) couldn't connect, which made them get final assault entrance in first launch ----> he had to be there, but he was not on the server :x, being some people down at attack at first isn't all too bad, but some people being down when you def is CRUCIAL, well about 2-3 times this happened. So I think a 7-7 would be most suited for this match.
Well, 24 flamed a lot, but they started with it, and I just didn't pay too much attention to that, it spoils the game if you do. Tense and GG/ BG @ flaming from 24! /// -=JeRoEn=- | The server was lagging for me! :( /// BIGBOSS | YOU started with flamin bullshit, so dont whine if i reflame /// HonK |
|
{24}: I seem to recall 24 playing SK (Std branch of PiP) when we were down by about 2 players through the whole match - it stayed friendly bcos we never blamed SK for not dropping. Our player problems were our own. Tonight the same players had plenty of people to play, but dropped 1 or 2 for a couple of maps voluntarily, bcos they didn't like getting owned. And for the rest of the match all we heard was insults about not evening up teams and 'you can only win playing 2 people down'. Fkin ell - what about the other 11 maps when the teams were even? If you have a team but they choose to leave at one point and then come back that's your problem, just like it was ours in Std 4 v 6. Not very cool of you PiP (well pretty much all Honk who barely stopped crying long enough to hit anyone) but fuck it. We deserved to win this - end of saga. Buh-bye :) - Useless
|